The Pro Slavery side of the classroom arguedon behalf of John Mann saying that he should have the $10 returned to him because he didn't kill the slave Lydia. During this time Jim Crow Laws were in place which were also known back then as slave codes which stated that the slave can be punished, and the owner can not be punished if they accidentally kill the slave. Therefore John Mann is protected by the laws for shooting Lydia. Back then slavery was for economic purposes so slaves were in a sense property, they didn't even get citizen ship either. To conclude, the side of John Mann stated that even God accepts slavery. Even though religion doesn't hold up in court, the court ruled in favor of John Mann and returned the $10 to him. After hearing the verdict I was in complete shock I really felt that the Pro Slavery side had a very strong argument but I guess laws are laws and there is no bending them.
About Me
My name is Kelly Bishop. I am from Parkland, Florida born and raised. I am currently 18 years old and will be attending Highpoint University as a freshman in the fall of 2020. I love music especially classic rock. I also love the ocean and scuba dive whenever I get the chance. I am looking into to being communications major but I am currently undeclared.
Monday, July 13, 2020
Pro slavery Vs. Anti Slavery
My last blog post was written about a man who basically goes against all of my morals. In class we were split into 2 sides pro slavery and anti slavery, then we were split into 2 different topics. One side argued State vs. Mann and the other was Pro slavery people vs. Anti slavery people. My side of the classroom had to take notes on the State vs. Mann case I found myself once again disgusted with our history. The State V. Mann case argued if or if not the slave owner John Mann should be punished by being fined $10 for shooting the slave Lydia in the back. The State started their argument off by saying that a slave owner Arthur William Hog whipped his slave to death for dropping a mango. Arthur was later hung as his punishment, therefore John Mann should also be punished even though Lydia didn't die. The anti slavery side continued by saying that John Mann only made things harder for himself by shooting Lydia because if she can't function, she can't work, he will also have to pay for her to be fixed up, and he could have permanently damaged her so she may never be able to work again. To conclude they said that since John Mann rented Lydia he is liable for the damages he causes to her under the contract he signed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Reconstruction Era EOTO
The Reconstruction Era is one of the most important era's in U.S history today. The 13th 14th and 15th amendment are also known as t...
-
Supreme Court Video Before watching this video I honestly couldn't tell you much about the Supreme Court, but after watching i...
-
My name is James Henry Hammond, I was born on November 15, 1807 in South Carolina. My political career started in 1835 when I was elected to...
-
On July 3rd in East St. Louis, Illinois a heated labor dispute turned into a deadly rampage where whites began brutally beating and killing ...
No comments:
Post a Comment